I know, it’s been a couple weeks. I had a few job interviews last week. I got a couple offers. I started one job Monday. I’m planning to pickup another but then I applied for passes to a convention in a few weeks so, I need to figure out how to start multiple jobs and then finagle the access if my passes get approved. And then I’ll need to figure out pretty much the same things for conventions in October and/or September. Some of my is coming together but of course, not quickly nor effectively enough. I was thinking about this earlier, I find myself in a damn near identical circumstance as twenty-two years ago. Unemployed, out of money, and starting a job for the same company. In regard to the symmetry of life, fuck that! Anyway, Plan B isn’t on the immediate itinerary. But I have something more pressing to talk about right now.
News broke yesterday about the new Stargate series and I was waiting to write something until I looked more into it. I saw a post somewhere and was calming going to look into it and then moments later, I saw a post from David Blue saying the same thing so I decided to put a little more urgency into my homework. It seems that Amazon wasn’t pleased with the current progress. Turns out that Martin Gero, with all his experience and time working on Stargate properties, that his work on this Stargate property was turning out to be too much Stargate. They fired from the project Martin Gero citing that his proposed direction was more for existing fans and less with the intent of appealing to a “wider audience”. Here’s what I think of that. If your intent is to reboot this franchise with a new series, then your intent, in so many words, is to disregard the existing fan base. You are ostensibly starting over to build a new fan base with a new property while calling it something old. That’s not a recipe for success. I was talking to a fellow nerd about this and paraphrased Ben Browder as Cam Mitchell when the character entered the series and to quote: “…I chose SG-1. That meant Colonel Carter, Teal’c, and yourself, not two letters a dash and a number.” My point here is that many fans, myself for one, wont necessarily follow a new anything just because of it’s named after something I love. Judging by fan bases of other properties like Star Wars, Star Trek, Thundercats, Knight Rider, Charmed, The Powerpuff Girls, and numerous others, it’s statistically unlikely for such a reboot of the Stargate franchise(keep in mind that this would be rebooting the entire franchise, 315 episodes across three series, two subsequent films, or three if you count the webseries Origins: Catherine cut together as a film.) and not just a single beloved series. Following this course of action, in a couple years when the reboot fails to perform there’ll be a room of executives saying to each other “How did it not work? We took the thing they loved and changed everything about it.”
I’ve been saying this in regard to reboots since this fad of rebooting started so many years ago. Why reboot something instead of doing something new? It’s been demonstrated repeatedly that people respond more positively to new things as opposed to redoing old things in worse ways. Even when you sequels. Historically sequels underperform compared to primary installments. The point here is that there’s little functional reason in buying a popular, established property to use it to make money, and then try to change it. They started this bringing on board Martin Gero, among the most notable names of the previous series with the intent of tying back to the established franchise. And then they got rid of him for tying back to the established franchise. I’ve worked in retail for pretty much the entire adult life and this ‘executive’ mindset is not exclusive to entertainment. Someone walks into a thing where they have no experience or substantive contribution, their reaction to the situation is to change everything about it, fail having undone the established progress and momentum of efficiency, and then ultimately have to go back to how things were done in the first place because their “new” concepts not only failed on their own merits but also undid previous success. Like I’ve said before and demonstrated in numerous posts on here, the established universe has literally infinite storytelling potential and instead these executives are going to try and make something new with an old name thinking that just calling it Stargate would be enough to sway nerds.
Once again, kids, THIS is why we learn history.